Jump to content

User talk:This lousy T-shirt/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Thank you

...for helping keep my talk page clean. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 17:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) This lousy T-shirt (talk) 17:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Your user name

This is the first time I've seen you on the recent changes. Great user name! --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, sir.  :) I feel highly complimented that someone with a great user name said that to me! This lousy T-shirt (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

*Clink*

--some jerk on the Internet (talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!


Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at 01:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...Cheers! --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 01:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Call it a day?

This edit was definitely not vandalism. I think you were right over at SummerWithMorons' talk. Have that whiskey pint up there and call it a night. :) --Danger (talk) 03:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

AHHHH.....that pint felt so good that I'm calling it a weekend!  ;) :D This lousy T-shirt (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Ninja-ide

Why did you label this article as a hoax? There are ten thousand Google hits for the name and it has a website at http://ninja-ide.org/ -- it may or may not be valid, but it is certainly not blatant. Please explain at the article talk page in this sort of situation. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Maybe I wouldn't have, if it hadn't been April Fool's Day. Already the article was tagged as lacking {{notability}} and {{unreferenced}}[1]. I tagged it as a "possible" hoax ({{hoax}})[2]. It never was tagged as a "blatant" hoax or {{db-hoax}}. This lousy T-shirt (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for the star! Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) This lousy T-shirt (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

Thanks

for the repairs. I'm wondering who the IP was. Must have upset him... Peridon (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) He seemed upset that you'd deleted some articles he'd created. That proves he's got an account, most likely a recently blocked account. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

173.238.221.157

This guy should probably just jump from something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.238.221.157 (talk) 18:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Hey, 173.238.221.157, JUMP SOON. Your saying I'm "fat" isn't going to make me fat. All of Wikipedia knows you're LYING about that. They all know you're lying that your English is better than mine. Is it even your native language? Or did you need to look up "how to insult someone in English?" I tell the truth and I hope the truth hurts. You'd better remember this one thing, FOOL. Your words have no power. You'd never dare say them to my face. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Please calm down. I've blocked the editor, but please ignore/revert them next time. —GFOLEY FOUR— 00:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
I will. And thanks. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, the Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states that:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Roodog2k (talk) 18:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

I only made one revert and did request page protection. That's all I'm gonna do. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
No worries. If everybody were allowed a certain number of edits in an edit war, these would last forever. I feel for you, though, and I understand your frustration. I would engage the appropriate noticeboard, if I were you, for some sort of adjudication. this would appear to be the appropriate channel. I asked the anon user to address his concerns at the talk page for Feminity.Roodog2k (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Re: A beer for you!

Re your message: Thanks! It was their other way over the top edits that made me suspect something. It took awhile for me to figure out who it might be as I didn't recognize them at first. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

Yes, I think you made a mistake

First, why would adding the year to a Guinness world record be a "mistake"?

Second, why would adding "slave beasts" to the entry be a "mistake" when that is the name used by his "owners" in ALL his official internet postings? The entry already had "adorable fearsome dictator" and "prodigious Scotch drinker", which are terms used to identity the Colonel by his "owners" and the public. Slave beasts was (and is) how his "owners" identified themselves and should be allowed on his Wiki page for continuity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streeten (talk • contribs) 19:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Streeten (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Do you have a link to one of those official Internet postings? If you do, you can add it back, with the source referenced beside it. As for the other, it's only February, isn't that too soon to hold a record for 2014? Especially with him dead now. Maybe 2013 though. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I apologize but I am knew here. I do not know how to source reference.

There are more than a dozen articles about the Colonel's passing that refer to his "owners" as "slave beasts". Here is one of them from CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/31/tech/social-media/apparently-this-matters-rip-colonel-meow/

Also, in several of the articles about his passing, it was stated that he would appear in the 2014 Guinness book but here is the link to the official Guinness page where his 2014 record is confirmed: http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2013/8/colonel-meow-the-cat-with-the-longest-fur-50832/

Would you be so kind as to help me properly source his page? Thank you very much. Streeten (talk) 19:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Of course I'll help. It's easy. I'll revert the page to your last version and add the sources you mentioned. Then I'll give you the link showing how I did it, so that you'll know how. It's easier to show than tell.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Here's how it's done[3]. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It's really important that readers know that the Colonel did NOT have "owners", even if "slave beasts" is more outrageous (which is the precisely the point) than "caretakers". Thanks again! Streeten (talk) 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk)

New question

Since you've been SO helpful and made my day, may I impose on you with another question? A publicly known friend of mine who has a Wiki page has complained about his published page picture and his inability to have it changed, even though he is the person the page is about. Where would I find information as to why that is and if there is anything that can be done about it? Thank you, again, for all of your help. Streeten (talk) 20:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

New question

Since you've been SO helpful and made my day, may I impose on you with another question? A publicly known friend of mine who has a Wiki page has complained about his published page picture and his inability to have it changed, even though he is the person the page is about. Where would I find information as to why that is and if there is anything that can be done about it? Thank you, again, for all of your help. Streeten (talk) 20:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll help if I can. Who is he? — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I'd rather not say in a public space. Is there a way to give you the link privately? I really appreciate this. Streeten (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to get the link to me privately. But I recommend asking at the TeaHouse. They'll be able to help you out without disrespecting your friend's privacy, which I want to respect as well. Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Perfect. Thank you! Streeten (talk) 20:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your direction was exact and I got what I needed. Thank you, again. Streeten (talk) 21:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

picture removal

I was wondering if you could remove the picture i recently put under august alsina page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovethehaters1996 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I did so just now. Happy editing!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Illuminatus Trilogy

Only conspiracy nuts believe the Eye of the Providence has anything to do with the actual Illuminati. Their symbol was the Owl of Minerva, so please, I ask you to restore my contribution. Thank you. --201.215.122.10 (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

OK. Maybe you've got a point. Call me names if you must but never accuse me of being a "conspiracy nut" please; that's AMUSINGLY wrong. :P — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! And, yeah, I'm deeply sorry for calling you that. Blame my "truther" friends xD --201.215.122.10 (talk) 23:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

RE: WesleyBranton

I plan to stay with the Wikipedia community.
I think that it is a great community.

WesleyBranton (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

You are right about that!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Providology

Hello Excirial This lousy T-shirt. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Providology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I do not see the necessary evidence that this was invented by the author or an acquaintance. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

@JohnCD: I've moved the above notification over here since the original CSD tag was not placed by me. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs)

Why did you revert my edit?

I am curious why you reverted my edit on the Group B Strep page? The reason I removed the sentences in that paragraph is as follows. The first sentence is just a statement of the values of NICE concerning the care of healthy pregnant women. The second sentence concerning NICE's attitude to GBS screening was presented in contrast to these values. This is not a neutral way to present information as it encourages the reader to assume that there is an conflict between NICE's values and their attitude to GBS screening. Consider the following 2 sentences:

  1. Bob owns 2 pet fish.
  2. Bob says he is kind to animals, however he owns 2 pet fish.

Because the second example presents bob's ownership of the fish in contrast to the fact that he is kind to animals, the reader is encouraged to assume (without the presentation of any factual argument) that Bob's ownership of the fish means that he is not kind to animals.

This is the exact same construction as used in the NICE paragraph in the GBS article and I therefore thought that the paragraph could be made more neutral by presenting NICE's policy on GBS screening without contrasting it with their values.

I am just curious as to why you reverted my edit as I thought it was reasonable and in keeping with Wikipedia's values of clarity and neutrality.

Also it is my first edit so I am disappointed that I have not been able to contribute!

Could you please give me a brief explanation of your actions. Hopefully this will clear things up for me and I will be able to contribute in the future.

Russellwstanley (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I did not find your message until this morning. You've explained it in a matter sufficient for me to understand why you edited as you did. At the time, it appeared you had simply removed information from the first paragraph. Please feel free to undo my edit or simply make your edit again. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

incidente de la sangre corrupta

Thank you very much for your concern about my article, all i want to say is that it's just my mistake,

all i wanted to do was include a spanish version of the article but i terribly mistaken the options of creation.

My sincerest apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Last son of kripton (talk • contribs) 21:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Muchas gracias but you do not need to apologise. I understood that your edits were made in good faith.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Judicial review

i just wanted people to know how friggen unreal judicial review is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.113.191.57 (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

But that's just your opinion, right? — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
*ninja poofs into the room*. Hello, This lousy T-shirt. No, this isn't a T-shirt - it's a cloak to make me invisible! Anyways, I am here to bestow upon you a great gift. No, it's not a lousy T-shirt! Just let me finish speaking. My stealthy spying skills have enabled me to see that you've been very hard at work keeping this encyclopedia you call "Wikipedia" clean... no, I did not see you with your pants down in the bathroom! Where was I? Oh yes, my master and I were so impressed by your efforts that we have decided to give you this barnstar as a reward. If you feel ready for an even tougher challenge, please speak to my master *hands business card* We spy on vandals and alert the main defense if we suspect an attack. And for the last time I'm not wearing a T-Shirt!... oh well. Goodbye *ninja poofs out of the room* K6ka (talk | contribs) 00:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
THANK YOU! I will treasure it and try to be worthy of it. :D — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

FYI on this IP Address

Thank you for your recent reversion on Space Mechanics. This is a shared IP address at a school, so some of our students may very well be editing Wikipedia pages from time to time during their class work. We welcome revisions to incorrect information and don't usually know that students have used the IP address for those purposes. 65.248.223.9 (talk) 17:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

hi there

can i ask you why did you delete the link I put?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.204.134 (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Only because it appeared to be spam and the article already had two external links of a similar nature. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

"Spitting"

Why did you remove the image? I thought it was a prime example demonstrating the act of spitting. I would advise you to revise your edit as there are no other images on the page providing insight into what spitting looks like. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.128.20.204 (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

One could make the same argument for the article on oral sex. In other words, most people know what it looks like and don't really want to look at others in the process of doing it. But if you use an illustration instead of graphic imagery, it makes the point well enough. Unfortunately, I haven't yet found an illustration of spitting. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

If you'd like, I can make one in Paint (software) and post it. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.128.20.204 (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

That would be cool. Give it a try!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that

Sorry about that, my son got into it, I will ground him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.1.246 (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Apology accepted, although he's welcome to edit Wikipedia if he does so constructively.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

You sure?

I saw this, but had to wonder if it wasn't an obscure reference to a specific Johnny Carson interview, which landed Carson in rather hot water for a while. :-) LeadSongDog come howl! 22:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

You could be right. Now that you've explained that one to me, I'll withdraw it from the list. WP:UAA is overwhelmed already with far more problematic names.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

Thanks for editing the CSR page

<->Hi there. Thanks a lot. I love Wikipedia, use it every day, have contributed cash but this is my 1st foray into content contribution. I really appreciate the help. The learning curve is fairly steep and I'm sort of supposed to be working...

Can I call on you for help at some future point?

DzigaV (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, certainly. Just let me know. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Manuscript Whisperer (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome note!

Hi! Thanks for the welcome! I am having a little trouble negotiating some of the pages, but I expect that that will resolve. (For example, I tried to send this message earlier, but apparently I left comment markers in place. Nothing appeared except my signature. Perhaps the instructions could mention that the intial bracket and exclamation point open a comment and that the closing bracket ends the comment--if, in fact, that is what they do. Is that what they do?)

My main question is: After I sign out, how do I get back to my user page later?

Regards,

Manuscript Whisperer (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

The easiest thing to do is make your user page the last page you visit before you log out. You should find yourself back there when you log in. I'm using the Safari browser and always end up on the last page I visited before I logged out when I log back in, if I leave that window open.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

misinformation

h,i've only read some of the book,however, i do not recall the plot actually stating audrina had beem rapen. have you read the whole, completed book, before you wrote this information article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.44.43 (talk) 04:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I did read the whole, completed book of My Sweet Audrina and have it on my Kindle Fire HD (I even went back and re-read every page carefully to be sure the information is accurate). — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

Protection

Want me to action this request? Yunshui 雲‍水 12:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes please and thanks!  :) Protection is indeed needed. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Without having seen that request, I had already taken the liberty of indefinitely semi-protecting your user page to reduce its vulnerability to vandalism. Let me know on my talk page if at any time you want me to either remove the protection or put a time limit on it. As far as I am concerned I see no reason not to leave it protected, since there is unlikely to be a good reason for an unregistered user or a new account to edit the page at all, but it's up to you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Dammit, clashed with James and inadvertently reduced his protection - I've now restored his choice of "infinite" as an expiry date. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks both of you.  :) I agree on leaving it protected. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A few barnstars

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar The Barnstar of Good Humor
The Multiple Barnstar
I'm looking through your contributions, and it seems like you're giving up hours and hours to fighting off vandalism and disruption on Wikipedia. grin Scrolling through your talk page, I can't help but smile at some of the threads. I have just met you, and I can't help but notice you're a tireless, working, vandal-fighting, good-humored editor that deserves these barnstars. Awarded to you for dedication, above all else. Thank you for your contributions, and may you keep on going! --Mz7 (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank YOU, for your kindness. Truly there are no words to say how much each one is appreciated or how touched I am!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 14:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for welcoming me.

Message added by Safetybelt.

You're welcome!  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

Informing suspected socks

Hello This lousy T-shirt. About your informing suspected socks, are you sure you are not spilling the beans? Because if it is necessary the filing editor can inform the suspected editors themselves, and even if they don't the SPI clerks/CUs and patrolling admins do inform the editors if they find a need to. -- SMS Talk 17:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

I meant to help with the backlog there on SPI, not spill the beans. But you have made a good point.  :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes I believe from the very start that you were doing it in good faith and Thank you for listening to my concern. Actually I have seen some socks altering their behavior to avoid detection by CU check or behavioral comparison with another editor. -- SMS Talk 17:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Come on!

Another silly username?!

Kitty 56 (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

No, this is my only account, I don't have "another" username, and mine's no "sillier" than yours, just much more CREATIVE?! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
A vandal fighter like you definitely deserves a cookie!! Bananasoldier (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! 😊😃 —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Emmaus International page

Hello This lousy T-Shirt, thanks for NOT REDIRECTING the Emmaus International page to that of Emmaus (charity) which is mostly about Emmaus UK (Emmaus national organisation in the UK, vs Eammaus international organisation worldwide). reagrds,

MA — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommEI (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh. OK. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Sorry About Venezuela It was my friend I will tell him not to mess with my account thanks for letting me know ps love the sandbox

Fyshhbrynfyshh (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome Message

Hi, Thanks for your compliments that made me feel welcome and secure. You decide that I should stay and make further edits but I don't think I would be able to do that. The other editors here made me frustrated and I so piss off with them. Bryan4562013 (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:This_lousy_T-shirt/Archive_2&oldid=1139040629"