User talk:Trackerwannabe

Welcome!

Hi Trackerwannabe! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome, Kmhkmh, as well as for the links to info regarding contributing to Wikipedia. Hopefully I'll make/find time to read through them, so as to feel more comfortable making more substantial contributions. To present, my edits have been minor (fixing broken links and the like). Trackerwannabe (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The main issue is this: a subject must have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. While you do have one source that is good, it needs coverage elsewhere, so it's not just one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trackerwannabe/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 22:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trackerwannabe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OnlyNano^talk 22:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OnlyNano!

Thank you for so quickly reviewing my proposed article, and for your feedback. (I also appreciate the links to so many resources, even if I find the amount of material overwhelming.) I have added a number of citations, from a few different sources, and hope to have it in shape to resubmit in relatively short order. Thanks again!

Trackerwannabe (talk) 11:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. Once you have chosen your references we can review it correctly

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trackerwannabe/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of amphibians of Vermont has been accepted

List of amphibians of Vermont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of reptiles of Vermont has been accepted

List of reptiles of Vermont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bryant (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Bryant. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed per linking to disambiguation pages which refers to links from set indexes: (e.g. Laing (surname) contains a link to John Laing (disambiguation)) as an exception to links to disambiguation pages being erroneous.

12:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Trackerwannabe (talk) 12:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vemront" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Vemront has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 31 § Vemront until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I'll have a look. Trackerwannabe (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thank you for not immediately R3ing the redirect. I am still a relatively inexperienced editor on Wikipedia, and engaging in the discussion has value in educating me in the accepted norms and conventions on Wikipedia.

Trackerwannabe (talk) 16:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nichols (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Nichols.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.

Trackerwannabe (talk) 20:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of mammals of New Hampshire has been accepted

List of mammals of New Hampshire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"A1P" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect A1P has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § A1P until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of contributors to Project 2025 (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In the cases of lists containing individuals as components of the list, each individual must separately meet WP:N, as per WP:PEOPLELIST. While there are some exceptions for lists containing the names of people who are largely N, where only a few people are not N, those exceptions don't apply to this specific list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of contributors to Project 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 04:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]