User talk:Ulrikke1994

Image copyright problem with File:TheInformersPremiere 002.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TheInformersPremiere 002.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ForgettingSarahMarshallPremiere 002.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:ForgettingSarahMarshallPremiere 002.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:TheInformersPremiere 006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TheInformersPremiere 006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a collection of unverifiable speculation. All information about anticipated events must be verifiable as certain to happen, such as your addition to the filmography in Kristen Stewart of two movies that have not begun filming. Please do not add information about future events to infoboxes, succession boxes, discographies and filmographies. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haj jk

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Haj jk, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 15:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Grant correct D.O.B

Sources clearly state correct age one article is written by a close family friend Ron Jackson. Unless you can supply a more reliable source than simeome who actually knows her or another news paper interview that was confided by her father in which it clearly states her age there is no need to undo. There are many sources online that state her correct age those can be added if more than 2 are required or unless you have a copy of her birth certificate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.19.183 (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correction made to D.O.B Elizabeth Grant was born June 21, 1985. She logged three copyrights with the United States copyright office. Two made in 2005 and one made in 2012. You have to submit your D.O.B as a copyright claim is a legal government document and Elizabeth Grant submitted her date of birth: go to http://cocatalog.loc.gov and search for; grant elizabeth woolridge select 'search by' option of name. Wikipedia is source for accurate and factual information and the source is a copyright government agreement. Deneuve15 (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]