User talk:Urharec

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Urharec. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=9dd5d36f-1856-43a7-a453-46f1f89f833b, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Church of st Martin in Bled (Slovenia) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Minima © (talk) 06:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding of pictures to articles

When you add a picture to an article, it is important to remember that we are creating an encyclopedia. It needs to be consistent. If you go back to the articles Gothic architecture and Cathedral you will see that every picture in those articles relates directly to the text that is in a nearby section or paragraph. Not one of those pictures were chosen randomly. The criteria is firstly: they illustrate the text or add information that enhances the accompanying text. Secondly: there has been an attempt in both articles to have a range of regions illustrated. Thirdly: they are all the best quality photos that are available. (For this reason, France, England and Germany may predominate, partly because of the large number of relevant buildings, but also because there are many good quality images. I would not use that chancel interior of yours in any general article, because of the low quality. It is only relevant to illustrating that particular church. There are many other views of chancels on Wikimedia Commons that are better from a photographic point of view.

So the message is, before adding anything, read carefully, look at the article, and see whether it is really the right place for your photo. I personally have taken dozens of photos of Gothic churches and cathedrals, but only a very few of my pictures appear in articles, because I always have to look and see if someone else has taken a better one. Amandajm (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Slovenia invite

Thank you for your recent contributions to Victorinus of Pettau. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future!

--Eleassar ^{my talk} 19:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jean Vodaine

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Jean Vodaine. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 12:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Vodaine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jean Vodaine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Extra note: Apologies for marking your article as a hoax earlier—that was a rushed and botched nomination on my part. Once again, the article is just in draftspace, and hasn't been totally deleted. Sorry once more. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 14:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]