User talk:Usman 17
October 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Usman 17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I assume I Have not read the policy carefully I will reread and follow strictly next time Usman 17 (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Usman 17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing to respectfully appeal the recent block placed on my Wikipedia account, Usman 17. I understand that my editing behavior led to this action, and I want to express my sincere apologies for any disruption or inconvenience it may have caused. I recognize that my actions were in violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I take full responsibility for my mistakes. I assure you that I have since taken the time to thoroughly review and understand Wikipedia's policies, including the guidelines on content editing, neutrality, and civility. I understand the importance of maintaining a high standard of quality, accuracy, and neutrality in Wikipedia articles. Specifically, I acknowledge that my previous edits were made with the assumption that the article I was working on was incomplete and one-sided. I now realize that there are established processes for addressing such concerns, and I should have engaged in a constructive discussion on the article's talk page or used the appropriate channels to propose changes. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that my future contributions are in line with community standards. I have learned from my mistakes, and I am determined to make positive contributions to the Wikipedia community going forward. I kindly request that my Wikipedia account be unblocked so that I may continue to contribute constructively to this valuable resource. I assure you that I will approach editing with a greater understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and will always strive to uphold the principles of neutrality and verifiability. Thank you for your time and consideration of my appeal. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia once again. Usman 17 (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. This unblock request was generated by an AI, according to zerogpt. We aren't interested in chatting with AI bots and this raises serious competency and judgment concerns, which you (not an AI bot) will have to address in any future unblock request. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.