Jump to content

User talk:Vensatry/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 15

Similar writings

I think you might be interested to see this. Secret of success (talk) 07:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm, needs a lot of work. Vensatry (Ping me) 05:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I was not talking about the articles. I was referring to comparing it with a similar post you had written. He seems to have copied 90% of his post from yours. Secret of success (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I guess he is strongly following both of us :P Vensatry (Ping me) 07:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

My desire to elevation

I really feel that articles on old tamil films (before the 1980's) should develop and receive GA status. Some of my best efforts include Karnan 1964, Pudhiya Paravai, Parasakthi, Uthama Puthiran 1958, Kappalottiya Thamizhan, Kalyana Parisu, Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum and so on. But some articles can never be made as GA, mostly bcoz they lack reliable sources. But seeing these articles, u think they can be elevated? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Good work with these articles. I don't think we'll be able to bring these to GA levels. If you have any old Tamil film books like "Theodre Bhaskaran", we can expand these articles. Vensatry (Ping me) 05:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Why i didnt disambiguate Alibabavum... was bcoz I wanted u to analyze both articles. Pls re-assess if u have seen any improvements. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Hi buddy. Sadly, Anil Kumble could not pass the GA review. There have been some suggestions by the reviewer. I've already started working on them. Please join me and lets solve all the issues asap. BPositive (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Just now came across the GA nom page. With a little amount of work it can be elevated to a GA. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Sure. I'm done with the first few issues. Do cross-check :) And also, the lead needs to be worked upon. :) BPositive (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Sure! We had a tough reviewer this time. Vensatry (Ping me) 17:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hahaha! Good to have a tough reviewer. Adds to the quality of the article. BPositive (talk) 17:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

GA/FA nominations

I recently read Sarvam and Avan Ivan. Dont u think both should be nominated for GA? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

There are many such articles close to GA criteria. Please don't nominate them for GA without consulting major contributors. Vensatry (Ping me) 08:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

DoMS NIT Trichy

Thank you for cleaning up the page. I am new to editing, trying to learn as much and as fast as I can. --Anshumandutta (talk) 07:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Vensatry (Ping me) 08:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Mani Ratnam

Hello! Your submission of List of awards and nominations received by Mani Ratnam at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 12:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Responded there. Vensatry (Ping me) 12:55, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Could you please have a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mohammad Yousuf/archive3. ZiaKhan 01:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Tough reviewer

If you think I'm bad, you should see some other reviewers! It's even worse at FA level. But I think it's best to aim for as high a standard as possible. I'm afraid I don't do lists, as Harrias says, but if you want me to cast an eye over any other cricket articles, I would be happy to (time permitting, of course). Sarastro1 (talk) 13:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Tough reviewer doesn't mean bad. IMO, it's the equivalent of good and it's best to aim for as high standards, as you say. I'd like to work on Rahul Dravid and make it a GA someday. Waiting for your inputs. Vensatry (Ping me) 14:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)I completely agree with your review on Anil Kumble. And it's good to have a tough reviewer. We are collectively working on the article and would like if you review it again for us when we nominate it again. BPositive (talk) 15:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd be delighted to help where I can. I'm afraid I don't really work on modern cricketers, but I am happy to help with reviewing or copy-editing. We certainly need some more Indian cricketers at GA and FA. Ping me if/when you want me to look at anything. Sarastro1 (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
I really don't do lists, but I've copy-edited the lead and left a few suggestions on the talk page. If you don't like anything I've done, just revert it; I won't mind! Sarastro1 (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Needing Wiki contribution assistance!

Greetings Vensatry,

I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia "notability" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:

http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble

Let me know if you would be willing to help!

Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com

Devbot (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

This bot has been blocked as a spambot. Jus for notification. BTW was I rude with you? Dipankan (Have a chat?) 11:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
It isn't a bot account. Rude? Not at all! Vensatry (Ping me) 11:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

NVOK

How's the article Neengalum Vellalam Oru Kodi, created by me? I edited almost the whole article, and it's been assessed as B-class. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Good job! Vensatry (Ping me) 08:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Probably one of the few articles I brought to B-class level... Kailash29792 (talk) 08:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers

Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers/archive1 needs your help for improvements. ZiaKhan 20:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Lakshmi Rai Page on Wikipedia

Hello User,

This is official webmaster of Lakshmi Rai.

We have been doing editing on Wikipedia regarding the Birth Date of Lakshmi Rai on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi_Rai

Will you please stop editing the Lakshmi Rai Page. We have updated the Recent information on the page.

The original Birth year is 1989. If you need any proof we are ready to provide you.

Reference Links: 1. http://popcorn.oneindia.in/artist/3216/2/lakshmi-rai.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldoflakshmirai (talkcontribs) 17:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


Look forward for your quick response.

Cheers :) Official Webmaster at http://www.worldoflakshmirai.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldoflakshmirai (talkcontribs) 16:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is free content that anyone can edit, use, modify, and distribute. You don't own the article and all content here is edited collaboratively. No one, no matter how skilled, or of how high standing in the community, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article. As for the year please provide some reliable third-party sources. popcorn.oneindia isn't a reliable one. Vensatry (Ping me) 18:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


Hello, Vensatry. You have new messages at Worldoflakshmirai's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Vensatry.... from where we can get your e-mail id to provide the legal government issued documents regarding Lakshmi Rai. (Worldoflakshmirai (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC))

Reliable sources such as newspapers, magazines, etc., are required. To send a mail to me go to my user page and at the left under the "toolbox" you'll find a link "E-mail this user". Just click that. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for List of awards and nominations received by Mani Ratnam

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

59th NFA

Hi. Me and Animesh finished the editing for the article. Can you quickly check and let me know if you find something before we push it for PR? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for List of international cricket centuries by Steve Waugh

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

FF South

Hey..are you working on Filmfare Awards South? I observed that formatting is inconsistent. In some cases, sources are also not available. - VivvtTalk 13:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Yup. I'll resume after a short break. Thanks! Vensatry (Ping me) 13:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok. Let me know, in case you need any assistance. - VivvtTalk 13:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
If you're free can you do some copy-edits to the article. Also we should remove the "Supporting Actor/Actress" count from the superlatives. Vensatry (Ping me) 13:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes. I ll try cleaning up to some extent. Lets decide on the formatting before we move ahead. For superlatives, lets wait till we get the concrete consensus on WP:INCINE. Most of them are in favor but still. - VivvtTalk 13:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

Hello, Vensatry. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mohammad Yousuf/archive3.
Message added ZiaKhan 23:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You've opposed this list because of prose concerns (and other reasons). Since then, I've copyedited the lead at the nominator's request, so perhaps you could take another look when you get a moment. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 11:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

INCINE notification

Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done Vensatry (Ping me) 05:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Mani Ratnam's Recurring Collaborations

Hi, This is regarding the reversion you made on Mani Ratnam's page of the recurring collaborations table created by me. Similar tables exist on other film director's pages on Wikipedia as well (refer Wes Anderson, Martin Scorsese) and are deemed useful, which is why they have been created in the first place. To completely remove it without discussion is definitely harsh, if not unwarranted. To further push for the table, I'd like to state that the multiple collaborations (especially Art direction, Cinematography and Editing) help in figuring out the technical difference in the works of the director. Also, the 'poor formatting' is based on the template on the Wes Anderson page. Please let me know your views regarding the issue.

Anant Singh (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

First of all, did you ever discuss before adding it to the article. Care to provide an edit summary for your edits? Is the Wes Anderson Martin Scorsese article a good example? The table looks haphazard without scroll bars. It makes navigation difficult and breaks the structure of the page. Just because other articles have something there doesn't mean that we should have the same here. Vensatry (Ping me) 05:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I've added the table with scroll bars. Vensatry (Ping me) 06:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
First of all I'd like to say that the table looks much better now and would like to thank you for it. As i said earlier, it provides an easy access to the array of technicians Mani Ratnam has worked with. But I'd also like to add that I strongly feel your behaviour borders on violation of Wikipedia:Civility. Here are my points.
(a) I didn't know one has to 'discuss' before contributing to Wikipedia. It wasn't as if I was vandalizing the page. Do you 'discuss' before making every single contribution to the site? Did you discuss the reversion you made? Wikipedia very clearly states the same point in its very first sentence (Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus")
(b) If it was just the 'haphazard' look of the table, you could have done what you did now earlier, without reverting. To revert, is to shoot down any contribution made, thereby making way for either Revert wars or WP:Bite
(c) As I stated earlier, as far as 'discussion' is concerned, you could have started one as well before reverting, considering the amount of time spent on researching each and every IMDb title for the collaborations. This just leads to WP:Bite
(d) (Just to justify my actions in the first place) I haven't included similar tables for other Indian directors, yet, but the fact that Mani Ratnam has had a long history of working with a handful of people, thereby 'recurring' his 'collaborations', i considered it extremely useful to be placed here.
Anyhow, all's well that ends well. The new table's format would definitely come in handy in future for editors.
regards, Anant Singh (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Delighted to read your brief post. I don't have to start a discussion when my explanations are quite clear in the edit summary. Have you ever made an edit summary for any of your edits, especially when you make a major change? I reverted your unexplained edit because the article is a recently passed GA and major changes needs to be discussed. I don't think I was harsh at any stage or my conduct was violating WP:CIV either. Vensatry (Ping me) 15:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject film award

Thanks a lot for it. Glad to see that a lot of new editors have come up to edit Tamil and Indian cinema. Secret of success (talk) 14:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

2 hits in 70's and 8 in 80's

10 off the 15 is mentioned in Imdb - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004564/bioOnceshook1 (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

The figure is not mentioned in the TOI source that you quoted. IMDb is not considered a reliable source since the content is user-generated just like wikipedia. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for supporting article of Indian Independence movement. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, just pinging you to edit on Indian Cuisine, which is the current COTM. We have only 5 more days to take it upto GA level. Do pitch in :) BPositive (talk) 06:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, sorry for the delay in getting back. It was mainly due to the hectic work load in real life that I was not able to participate in this month's COTM. I can see if I can improve a few sections of the article, though not as a part of "COTM June". Vensatry (Ping me) 19:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Indian film songs articles

If you get a chance, please express your opinion here. - VivvtTalk 17:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done Vensatry (Ping me) 19:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits

Hello, I acknowledge that I don't use the edit summary as much as I should, but it does not take too much effort on your behalf to click to see the differences (ie press the diff button). You recently decided to revert two pages to incorrect versions without real care or knowledge of the changes which had been adapted. Here [1] you have re-inserted peacock terms such as "whopping", superlatives for the musician Devi Sri Prasad and an incorrect member of the cast, leading to confusion. Moreover here, [2] you have removed sourced information and once again, re-inserted incorrect information. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Editor 2050 (talk) 20:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit especially when you are making major changes. You could have shortly explained this in your edit summary. Busy editors may not have time to review each and every edit of yours. So try providing edit summaries for every major edit as many don't really care to check them while reverting. Vensatry (Ping me) 04:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Your talk page has a history of warnings from multiple users for the same and it seems that you never cared for it. Even I issued a notice for not providing edit summary and you simply ignored them. You never bothered to respond for any of such warnings. Vensatry (Ping me) 04:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh. Editor 2050 (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Add an extra colon while making a new post, else outdent posts using the {{od}} template. Vensatry (Ping me) 12:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Unreleased / Shelved Films

Kamal..I am adding it back Venky..with Marudhanayagam as well. I will later create page for Kandaen Seethayae where I have the magazine for shooting report. What do you say..I think even Marmayogi can be added here.. Rajeshbieee (talk)

Don't add a separate section for such film. Include that under the respective years. No timestamp is there in your post. Use four (~) while signing off your posts as the bot will not archive the post. Vensatry (Ping me) 06:40, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

FLC ping

I was asked by the nominator to look at the prose at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Kumar Sangakkara/archive1; would you mind revisiting and seeing whether your oppose on prose still stands? You raised a few further issues arising from my copyedit at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mohammad Yousuf/archive3, which I hope I've addressed to your satisfaction. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 22:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll respond as soon as possible. Vensatry (Ping me) 06:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Barbeque Nation

Hello! Your submission of Barbeque Nation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Vijay Awards

For the 'Most Nominations' part in Vijay Awards,I think best background score nominations have been left out.Both composers should have one more nomination.Background score was a new category introduced in the 6th Vijay Awards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.101.110 (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Vijay special appearaance in rowdy rathore

Hi vensatry this is bothiman is there any other way to use that image I thought all the images in bollywood hungama are free of licence but now since I cropped it and changed its resolution its my own work .can I submit it atleast as my own work? If possible please you make those changes and reupload that photo. because there is always very old photo from long back of vijay being used all the time so I changed it with current one.please help with the photo somehow. thank you:):) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bothiman (talkcontribs) 14:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

You cannot use that image as it's non-free one. Not all the images from BH are fully owned by them. An image can be called as your own work, only if you have photographed that. You cannot crop/make changes and submit it as your own work. Please sign your posts on talk pages by typing. ~~~~. Vensatry (Ping me) 10:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you add to your watchlist? It gets some random vandalism once in a while but no one seems to have it on their watchlist, so stuff stays on until I log in. Also, this South India International Awards articles created by Ancienzus may have to be deleted if they aren't notable. Ancienzus is a sock of Kalarimaster, so they can be deleted as G5 if others haven't contributed. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 19:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I watchlisted the page long back. But somehow, I miss that many a times. SIIMA seems to be a notable award ceremony since it received enough coverage from many newspapers. The 1st SIIMA Awards can be CSDed, since Ancienzus is a sock as you say. Also there is no need for a separate article for the same at this stage. Vensatry (Ping me) 10:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

Cricket Barnstar for you!

Cricket Barnstar
For your good work on cricket related lists. Keep it up! ZiaKhan 18:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Vensatry (Ping me) 06:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

And well done from me too - thank you also for giving me a barnstar, it's appreciated. Best wishes, BencherliteTalk 08:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Message!

I have read your page notice above, but, I do not use Talkback template, so writing manually. I have replied to your post in my talk page! See it when you have time!--Tito Dutta 11:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Indian Premier League IRC meetup

Hello, Vensatry/Archive 10! WikiProject Indian Premier League is having an informal meetup on Internet Relay Chat channel #wikipedia-en-ipl connect. It scheduled for 9:00 pm IST (3:30 pm UST), 5 July 2012. You are most welcomed to attend.

This notice have been sent to you because you are a member of WikiProject IPL. To discontinue receiving WikiProject IPL notices and newsletters, please add your name here.

I'd like to know what sort of criteria is being used to add places to this list. Initially, I had chosen to add municipalities and MCorps with pop > 100,000 but it appears someone has added smaller places like Tiruvallur as a part of Chennai agglomeration. If the editor has done so with the intention of adding all the constituents of Chennai agglomeration, then we must have places like Maraimalai Nagar, Guduvanchery, Singaperumal Koil, Nazarethpettai, Kundrathur, etc., in the list. And then, I find that Kanchipuram has been included while the more important and closer Chengalpattu has been left out.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 14:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Kanchipuram was included based on this source. Some anon had included other places like Tiruvallur. The source doesn't clearly mention the constituents of the metropolitan area. Since Kanchipuram is a bit far away from the core city than other places, it finds a special mention. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:49, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello Vensatry, I really like the way you are contributing to WP India education related articles, you are doing a fantastic job, keep it up. I would plea to you if you could contribute at Kuvempu University article, since this article requires enormous contributions and also try to bring to other WP India editor knowledge so that they too can contribute to the article substantially. Cheers!--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

Hello,any chance you could have a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers/archive1. ZiaKhan 07:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Your opinion requested

I am looking forward for your opinion on this. --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

Hello!

Hai Vensatry, Nice to meet u. Ramesh Ramaiah talk 02:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

You too! Vensatry (Ping me) 10:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

About Rahul Dravid clean up.

I see that you cleaned up about 4KB of the article. Although you did provide an edit summary, it would have been more helpful if after making such wholesome change to the article, you had summarised the change on the talk page. I tried to check history but it so tedious. I'm just concerned that you didn't lose any important fact or citation/reference from the article. Could you please summarise the nature of your edit on the talk page? Skagrawal4k (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

My edit summaries were quite obvious. The article is undergoing many edits from many new users and anons who keep adding repeated facts that too at irrelevant sections. The format of the lead was inconsistent. The External links contained a list of links that shouldn't be included under that. Also there was a "Trivia" section which is nothing but a repetition of the same facts which were already mentioned elsewhere in the article. Vensatry (Ping me) 10:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hmm. I was just concerned that information should not be lost. Btw what was the need to remove the teams Dravid has represented?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skagrawal4k (talkcontribs) 13:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I feel a separate section for teams (representing a mere table) is unnecessary since the prose part and "infobox" adequately lists out the teams that he played for. Vensatry (Ping me) 13:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

I wish to expand this article. Do you have any books or scholarly articles - English or Tamil on the subject?-RaviMy Tea Kadai 16:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you write articles on Chitti and Krithika. Am feeling too lazy to write one.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 17:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't have any books right now. As for Chitti and Krithika, I can see if I can create articles on them. Vensatry (Ping me) 10:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
By the way, did you make a subscription for HighBeam Research. Vensatry (Ping me) 13:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, Highbeam isn't that good. I come across much better stuff on Google Books and archive.org. I've applied for JSTOR access and I'm awaiting for the results. Once that comes, digging out stuff from the net will become much easier.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 17:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

List of Indian submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film

Thanks for trying to source this article. It looks like you removed the link to filmfed.org, which needs to be in there somewhere. I am hoping that you can find a source for Mughal-e-Azam because I am trying to GA that one now. BollyJeff | talk 13:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

I might have probably missed that while cleaning up the reference part. According to this article no Indian film was sent to the Oscars in 1960. Vensatry (Ping me) 13:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Wow! When you figure it all out, this template will need to be updated as well: Template:Indian_submission_for_Academy_Awards BollyJeff | talk 13:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
There are a few more unsourced entries as well. Try finding sources before removing them. Vensatry (Ping me) 17:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)