User talk:Vigneswaran Rajkumar

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 03:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reset your blocked and extended it to 1 week for block evasion through on IP. Regards, MuZemike 03:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 02:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dear admin

hello admin. i do not understand why my account have been listed for sockpuppetry. i am the only one this account. i would like to request to lift the ban. thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vigneswaran Rajkumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i would like to request to lift the ban as i am the only one using my account.

Decline reason:

You have misunderstood the problem; the problem is not that other people are using the same name, but that you are using several different accounts, including User:Cinefan, User:Sivafresh, and others. In addition to that, you seem to be using your account to advertise your company, which is against the rules. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vigneswaran Rajkumar → Fivevillage

Current name: Vigneswaran Rajkumar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
Requested name: Fivevillage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
For global renamer: rename user
Reason: since there a user have create a wiki page with the same name, i would like to request to change to another. i am not the creator of Vigneswaran Rajkumar's wiki page, i would like to change my user name. to prevent my sockpupters from using my name, i would like to change my user name. thank you very much and for your inconvenience Vigneswaran Rajkumar (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Admin note

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar before unblocking. WuhWuzDat 17:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Admin

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vigneswaran Rajkumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware of the rule as i have read through them throughly. My apologize if i cause any inconvenience. I am not using my account to advertise a company. The page was under the scope of wikipedia's specific category. There are several reference and link was taged. And Before i could even revise and expand the article, the account is block and deleted. I would like to request to unblock my account. Thank you.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of No Ten Dollars Ride

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is No Ten Dollars Ride. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Ten Dollars Ride. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Because of your repeated acts of sock puppetry, you are now indefinitely blocked. You have been given enough chances, but yet you continue to abuse multiple accounts. Regards, –MuZemike 21:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]