User talk:WDGraham/April 2014
This is an archive of past discussions with User:WDGraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
"Deorbited" satellites
From Maurin des maures: ref article:List of USA satellites
reason to mark USA 111, USA 39 and USA 65 as deorbited:
last TLE for USA 111 (from McCants listing)
UFO F5
1 23589U 95027A 14080.56953588 0.00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 05
2 23589 8.6557 36.5440 0001084 256.1540 103.8460 0.98745968 06
last TLE for USA 39
DSP F14
1 20066U 89046A 14080.50928546 0.00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 06
2 20066 14.1078 19.8233 0005001 73.8411 286.2260 0.98815298 09
last TLE for USA 65
DSP F15
1 20929U 90095A 14055.48891202 0.00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 07
2 20929 14.5652 24.0592 0004742 19.5861 340.4442 0.98395640 01
Maurin des maures (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think you may be getting your terminology confused. Those elsets show satellites which have clearly not been deorbited - once a satellite is deorbited you won't get any more elsets as, by definition, it is no longer in orbit. Instead I would suggest that these satellites have simply been decommissioned and moved away from their operational orbit. This is not the same as deorbiting a satellite, which is the act of removing it from orbit altogether (not just from its operational orbit) - usually by causing it to reenter the Earth's atmosphere, which is not practical with geosynchronous satellites. --W. D. Graham 21:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- By "deorbited" I meant "sent to the graveyard orbit" (altitude > 36100 km)
These 3 satellites are all above 36200km
UFO F5: mean altitude: 36220 km
DSP F14: mean altitude: 36200 km
DSP F15: mean altitude: 36320 km
Maurin des maures (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Deorbited" is not the correct word to describe that. --W. D. Graham 18:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
SpaceX rocket engine family
There is an article MOVE proposal over on Talk:SpaceX rocket engine family. You've had good input on article naming consistency etc. in the past; thought you might want to take a look. (I haven't decided yet, and actually want to hear more views on it.) N2e (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)