User talk:WaluigiSmith

Proposed deletion of 132 Shackleton road

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 132 Shackleton road, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article does not indicate why house is notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster _talk 03:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 19 Shackleton Road

A tag has been placed on 19 Shackleton Road requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 04:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hollywood, Los Angeles, California has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Synchronism (talk) 05:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Tom Guernier"

A page you created, Tom Guernier, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Synchronism (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent warnings: December 2008

The recent edit you made to Hollywood, Los Angeles, California constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 05:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Google. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Synchronism (talk) 05:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hisense Arena, you will be blocked from editing. – Liveste (talk • edits) 05:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Googly eyes. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —Noah 05:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 07:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]