Jump to content

User talk:Wehrmachtvnn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Wehrmachtvnn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


oi

[edit]

you edited the naval battle of 1988 and made it seem like the chinese were evil, you violated the neutral view of the wiki by making the article full of lies and pro-vietnam bias Btzkillerv (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested reading

[edit]

Have a look at the Neutral Point of View policy. PhilKnight (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spratly Islands

[edit]

It doesn't matter if you wanted to "do it for honour of all the Vietnamese martyrs 1988 who lost their lives to defend Vietnam´s territory." This is a global encyclopedia and not a collection of personal opinions. The neutrality of the article is clearly biased towards the Vietnamese side, also the English used to construct the article is very poor, but since English wasn't your first language that can be forgiven and easily reconstructed. However neutrality is the core of articles. All personal point of views should remain out and if you would want to contribute with what you regard to be non-biased info CITATIONS ARE NEEDED[citation needed]! What you are adding is merely a biased piece of work that belongs in a Vietnamese History textbook and not in, at least an attempt to be, a neutral encyclopedia. Silent Assassin (talk) 11:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I continue from the above user,you have already met several warnings both from me and other admins, if you continue to post biased work and spread lying (sorry for the tone, but you have been given sufficent warnings, all of which which you have ignored) propaganda like "Vietnamese martyrs 1988 who lost their lives to defend Vietnam´s territory.", if you continue to ignore this and continue to spread propaganda I have no choice but to refer you to an admin on account of extremely rasist pro-vietnam bias in an unneeded article, and failure to stop dispite several warnings, which will make you fully applicable to blocks and eventually the deletion of both this page and your article, as well as giving you an indefinite block, if you fail to respond within 1 week i will have no choice but to refer you to an admin on account of you ignoring several warnings and continue to make biased contributions Btzkillerv (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Spratly Islands, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Spratly Islands. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Spratly Islands. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alpha77a (talk) 12:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]