User talk:Wikipediaw

Wikipediaw, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Wikipediaw!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Wikipediaw! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:21, Sunday, May 31, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Polish presidential election

Please stop edit warring and discuss the issue on the talk page rather than repeatedly reverting. Thanks Number 5 7 17:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the Ukrainian article was also incorrect; Poroschenko ran as an independent. See here. Number 5 7 18:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And now you are incorrectly adding parties to the Russian presidential elections. United Russia wasn't even founded until 2001, so claiming Yeltsin ran as its candidate in 1991 is laughable. If you continue making these types of edits, I will have to ask for you to be blocked. Number 5 7 06:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm PrimeHunter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Democracy Index because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Democracy Index. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Democracy Index, you may be blocked from editing. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russian presidential election, 2008

Your change to capitalize the word president is not in agreement with the advice given in WP:JOBTITLES: "Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, pope, bishop, abbot, executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically". Please read and understand the guideline, and then make the appropriate changes to the article. Chris the speller ^yack 01:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

If you incorrectly change the party on the Russian presidential election articles again, I will request that you be blocked. Please stop inserting false material into Wikipedia. Number 5 7 07:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 62.107.216.149 (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2015 Wimbledon Championships – Girls' Singles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by prevalence of opiates use. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Max Semenik (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipediaw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because what I edited on some Wikipedia pages which I thought were right were actually wrong. I apologize and I am very sorry for putting the wrong information on those Wikipedia pages. Please give me a 2nd chance. Thank you. Wikipediaw 00:30, 19 July 2015

Decline reason:

Please indicate where you obtained the clearly incorrect information which you added. Sometimes repeatedly. What do you understand by WP:SOURCE?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your changes were reverted repeatedly and you were warned repeatedly. Yet you made no effort to explain yourself, until now that you've been blocked. Why was that? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]