User talk:WilyD/Archives/2008/March

Re:Chris Dodd

I don't know what's going on with Chris Dodd presidential campaign, 2008. But I'll call a spade a spade, rather that beat around the bush.[1] A drive-by editor who deletes half the content of an article is a vandal in my book, and I'll label such behavior as vandalism as I please in my reversion summary. -- Kendrick7^talk 17:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to get all Machiavellian, I should suspect it is Clinton supporters who are behind these removals -- note the repeated deletion of Dodd's endorsement of Obama which keeps being slipped in. I otherwise don't understand where all these people are coming from to weigh in on a WP:LAME WP:STYLE dispute. Otherwise, STX claims to disagree with Dodd on "almost every issue." I might vote for Dodd someday if I move to Foxwoods on a permanent basis, but that's neither here nor there. I'll stick to calling vandalism vandalism, and we can burn the next bridge when we come to it. -- Kendrick7^talk 22:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Muhammad again

Hi WilyD. I'd like to draw your attention to some of the unnecessarily provocative/baiting comments being made on Talk:Muhammad.[2][3][4] ITAQALLAH 01:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Pseudoscience discretionary sanctions

Hi! As somebody who commented on a January proposal to place all articles related to homeopathy on article probation, I would greatly appreciate your input on a new proposal to help combat disruption that would scrap the probation and implement discretionary sanctions. I apologize for any intrusion, but this is to my knowledge the first time sanctions of this nature have been attempted to be enforced by the community, so I feel that a wide range of opinions is necessary. Thank you in advance for any comments you may make. east718 (talk) 18:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Xinunus

Unblock him if you want, but if he continue to harass users, via email or any other means, consider that a new block will be reinstated. Also, please remind him of the ORIGINAL reason for his block, which appears to be that he is removing large sections of well-referenced text from the Dennis Hastert article, and edit warring there (if you check his contribs, you can CLEARLY see the problem). Please feel free to unblock him, but also remind him that he should play by the rules... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Block of IP address 129.11.76.229

I've decided to unblock 129.11.76.229, given the time which has passed since the block. Given it's record, I think a 1 month block is more than enough; you gave it 1337 days, which is about 3.66 years! Since over a month has passed, I unblocked it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirects

Please don't add anything to Category:Redirects as you did here. The category should be empty, but as you can see... Richard001 (talk) 07:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)