User talk:Xerxes Limki

.

Concern regarding Draft:Xerxes Limki

Hello, Xerxes Limki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xerxes Limki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Xerxes Limki

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Xerxes Limki, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xerxes Limki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account got blocked for not being here to create an encyclopedia. I’m sorry if my edits didn’t meet the standards. I’m now committed to making positive contributions and following the guidelines. Xerxes Limki (talk) 09:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 09:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) You are not allowed to modify (or remove) your declined unblock requests while the block is still in force (See WP:BLANKING). I have since reverted your edit to your declined request above. If you want to appeal further, you may make a new unblock request below.~ SG5536B (talk) 11:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xerxes Limki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account got blocked for not being here to create an encyclopedia and making disruptive edits. I’m sorry for my previous actions and understand that they disrupted the community and didn't align with Wikipedia’s purpose. I realize that my edits should contribute positively to the encyclopedia. I understand why I was blocked and promise not to cause any more disruptions. I’m now committed to making useful contributions and following the guidelines. The block isn’t necessary anymore because I understand what I did wrong, won’t repeat it, and will make useful contributions instead. Xerxes Limki (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is a start, but you don't say what edits you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What contributions do you want to make? A specific, substantive example(more than just fixing spelling or grammar) would be helpful. 331dot (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]