User talk:Zack4812

Welcome!

Hello, Zack4812, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Zack 4 8 12, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! XXX antiuser ^eh? 15:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack 4 8 12

A tag has been placed on Zack 4 8 12 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 15:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steeples Elementary Schoo

The redirect that's there now is a better fit for Wikipedia, since this school doesn't meet the notability criteria. Wikipedia is a real encyclopedia; if you don't have the skills needed to write a major encyclopedia, you probably should wait until you're a bit older before contributing. Thank you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

We're going to leave Steeples Elementary School as a redirect. I think you're probably a very nice kid who doesn't yet know how to write an encyclopedia for adults, so I'm being nice to you, but it's also true that other people are having to spend time fixing your edits. While I'm sure you're going to be a useful editor at Wikipedia some day, if you make another inappropriate edit, even though you mean well, I'm going to block you from editing until you are older. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break

A tag has been placed on Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break

The article Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL much?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodricks big break, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. DanielRigal (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Stuffed toy. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 04:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: sorry

Hiya, if you read the above message that I left (section December 2010) the issue was not that you added inappropropriate material, but that you removed material from the article Stuffed toy. Like the notice says, I wasn't sure if it was your intention or not to remove this material, so I left the notice to call your attention to what had happened. If you don't remember, it was a while ago, here are diffs of your edits: first edit, second edit. I have since restored the material and everything is alright now, so you don't need to worry. Apologies if the first notice I left wasn't clear enough, but I hope this message clarified the issue. Feel free to ask me if you have any further questions. Siawase (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]