User talk:ZaraShultz

February 2021

Hello, I'm 94.9.167.179. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Jas Mann in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Claiming racism, and trivialising a serious issue as an excuse for removing content you just don't like, is unacceptable. 94.9.167.179 (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Jas Mann. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. There is no "racism" or "religious offense". It is NME coverage of a musician. Stop it. 94.9.167.179 (talk) 22:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZaraShultz! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Jas Mann that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Rob van vee 06:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Jas Mann, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Stop with the unjustified removal of reliably sourced material and the threats to fellow editors. Also, you appear to have a conflict of interest with regards to this article, something I advise you to disclose. Rob van vee 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if you feel there is a conflict and i assure you there isn't. However perhaps you should look into why trolls are posting out of context content that is highlighting sensationalism? Why this contributor so insistent in highlighting this 'specific' material, seems dubious in itself.

No CoI you say? I'm afraid your assurance is lost on me. How many other articles have you edited? Though you may disagree, their edit is justified and reliably sourced even though you may not like it. Your unwarranted reversions are disruptive and I would advise you to read some of the applicable blue links left for you above, especially WP:CoI and WP:OWN. Thanks you. Rob van vee 19:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]