Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$uicideboy$

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

$uicideboy$ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this as an WP:A7, but on the talk page the article's creator claims that they've collaborated with Bones. Bones's article offhand has issues with sourcing (an over reliance on social media and non-RS like Vice), but his article isn't the one up for discussion and this is enough to give at least a slight assertion of notability.

A search for sourcing brings up little to nothing that would establish notability. There are a few mentions here and there, typically in routine notifications of performances. There are some places like Vice that give some coverage, but not in a place that would be both in-depth and reliable. (The problem with Vice is that they engage in gonzo journalism and have frequently been deemed non-reliable at WP:RS/N.) They've occasionally featured on other people's mixtapes but none of this has translated into in-depth coverage for the group. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, for now. The band is certainly bubbling under in terms of mentions-in-passing, but I can't see any sign that this article meets the WP:MUSIC notability standard yet. Once they've had more success, the article can then be re-proposed for creation. -- The Anome (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.