Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"The Fore and Aft" Regiment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 05:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"The_Fore_and_Aft"_Regiment

The page is an extension of the "Fictional Regiments of the British Army" page that is full of links to articles about other fictional regiments. The article contains information about the regiment mentioned in the story "The Drums of the Fore and Aft" and there are other fictional regiments so profiled, some from TV shows or movies with less provenance that this article. I say that if the main page and its other sub-articles stand, then this should stand as well. The "Thursday Next" series of books, for exaple, has a healthy representation there, and they detail units from an alternate universe that hunt werewolves and vampires with hovertanks! Hotspur23 13:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article referred to is List of Fictional British Regiments. Personally, I think a list is just the thing for this information--or articles about the work or the author. DGG 16:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a fictional group, cites nonsensical notability, no references to assert notability, patent nonsense in my opinion, even if it is something by Kipling it does not belong here Tdmg 07:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Didn't seem to fit into any speedy category; I doubt it is nonsense, if it is the subject of Rudyard Kipling's story (or poem) "The Drums of the Fore and Aft". But it certainly has no place in WP as an article about the fictional regiment. If Kipling's work is well-enough known, perhaps that is the proper subject. DGG 08:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete I have no idea at all what the hell this article is about. Kripto 10:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research ➥the Epopt 13:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 14:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per as a article about a minor fictional item, and lack of sources.-- danntm ^T _C 15:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.