Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¥120 Stories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for now. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

¥120 Stories

This is a non-notable, Japan-localised game which isn't sold or marketed abroad and the article is a stub which doesn't even include a plot and detailed info about it.
Summary ( some stuff I said may be repeated again):

Game is marketed only in Japan and nowhere else
Game's name contains a character non-standard to the US keyboard layout
Non-notable, not mentioned in any game reviews, magazines, news, etc.
Not enough information to verify existence (plot, rules are missing, article about the game's creator is not yet created)

Æåm Fætsøn (talk) 10:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Points 1 and 2 have no bearing upon whether we keep or delete articles, note. Uncle G (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And if point 2 was a reason we would have to delete the nominator's user and talk pages.Phil Bridger (talk) 19:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - warey of WP:BIAS, I've had a scout around for sources to indicate notability. The Japanese Wikipedia has an article [1] but unfortunately does not cite any sources. Some of the more reliable Japanese gaming websites have directory entries for the game, but no substantial coverage ([2], [3] etc have basic information and "guest reviews".) Has probably had some magazine coverage but I think the article will have to go until something turns up. Marasmusine (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Maybe Japanese sources exist, but if no EN:WPian can find them, this should be deleted as unverifiable, with nothing against recreating if/when sources are found (and appear at the JN:WP page).Yobmod (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.