Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Best Companies for Working Mothers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
listcruft and not at all encyclopedic hoopydinkConas tá tú? 13:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom hoopydinkConas tá tú? 13:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete already online at the ref cited Tom Harrison Talk 14:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Arnzy (whats up?) 14:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subjective, Americo-centric list. Little encyclopedic value. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the cruft is strong with this one. Danny Lilithborne 21:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, copyright violation from the original source. "evaluative list"s are intellectual property. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Cloachland 02:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a subjective list, concur with Zoe's copyvio concern. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Treebark 22:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sumahoy 01:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 23:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.