Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1263 Varsavia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1263 Varsavia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, consensus is that it is well-discussed rather than redirected unilaterally. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO's guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I found at least a pair of light curve studies, plus multiple mentions in other sources. Praemonitus (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Along with the light curve studies (one individual and one as part of a triple) it has been included in some occultation studies [1] [2] and Google scholar is also telling me about another 1956 paper on its orbit, "New Elements of (1263) Varsavia" (Minor Planet Circulars 1956) that I can't track down any more information about. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per above opinions. Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.