Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1318 Nerina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 01:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1318 Nerina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Fails per WP:SCIENCE. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found five separate lightcurve studies that included this object [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. That's more than enough, I think. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sufficient sources per David. -- Kheider (talk) 14:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: it's also a high inclination X-class asteroid and a probable interloper into the Phocaea family.[6][7] Praemonitus (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:NASTRO per the sources provided above. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.