Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 Bat Burglary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 21:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 1994 Bat Burglary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A relatively minor sports news event that doesn't seem to be notable enough to have an article of its own. A brief mention in related articles (e.g. 1994 Cleveland Indians season, Albert Belle, and Jason Grimsley) should suffice. There are also concerns about WP:BLP, especially regarding Grimsley's involvement: the article title characterizes the incident as a "burglary" which doesn't seem to be supported by most of the sources. *** Crotalus *** 14:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- The topic is the subject of numerous articles in reliable sources. Dlduncan2 (talk) 19:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -Drdisque (talk) 20:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Enough reliable sources, and the topic is independent enough of all three suggested articles to keep. "Burglary" can be edited to more neutral language. --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 04:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep For many of the reasons stated above, plus the Pine Tar Incident- which is similar in stature to this story- also maintains its independent article.-RomeW (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.