Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Turkish incursion in Iraq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Turkish-Kurdish conflict. - KrakatoaKatie 21:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Turkish incursion in Iraq

The reported incursion was reportedly fake. Perhaps rather than a delete a merge to Kurdistan Workers Party would be better. -- Cat ^chi? 09:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge to Turkish-Kurdish conflict --TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Partial merge, but some of it should be retained; I doubt that the Turkish incursion was a fake. If it turns out to be true, as I suspect, then it should be at 2007 Iraqi Kurdistan War similar to 1997 Iraqi Kurdistan War and 1995 Iraqi Kurdistan War. —Nightst a llion (?) 12:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The background section is well referenced but consists of the majority of the article and the subject matter isn't sourced at all. User:Nightstallion has the best solution, I feel. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 11:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I'm the guy who wrote the article and I'm sorry if it's not up to snuff. This was actaly the first article I wrote for wikipedia. Anyways I have sources for the timelene but when I went to add them the next day I saw the don't edit until the deletion debate is resolved thing so i didn't touch it. Anyways at this point all media sources agree that there is a Turkish presence in Iraqi Kurdistan and that there are 11 confirmed Turkish millitary casualties. I personaly say it should stay because it appears very likely that this conflict could escilate. If not it could be renamed the Turkish-Iraqi Kurdistan Crises of 2007.

Merge Some of the information is relevant, and since it did make a bit of huff it is probably notable enough for a section in an article or larger scope such as the Turkish-Kurdish conflict article as was said previously. Since this was essentially debunked as an actual entry onto Iraqi soil and does not have any serious implications as a result of that, The article itself is not notable or encyclopedic enough to stand.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 20:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Turkish-Kurdish conflict - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 05:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valid topic, however it needs a cleanup. IP198 20:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.