Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Michigan Bucks season
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- 2012 Michigan Bucks season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not an excessive listings of statistics and fails WP:NSEASONS. Kingjeff (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Kingjeff (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NSEASONS, consensus is that only teams in fully professional leagues are sufficiently notable to justify their own season articles. Also a WP:NOTSTATS failure as containing no significant sourced prose. Fenix down (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability, from WP:NSEASONS or WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - same reasons as others, though I appreciate the effort made with sourcing. Mosmof (talk) 05:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.