Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Alberta floods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Alberta floods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hasn't been expanded from 3 sentences in over 10 days. Seems like news, with no lasting coverage. 117Avenue (talk) 02:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE news. A flood of this small magnitude will not have lasting coverage unlike last year's 2013 Alberta floods. An article for last year's event is not a precedent for articles on every flood occurring in Alberta that follows. Hwy43 (talk) 02:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It was severe for many people, but the biggest flood in a year is not notable event in the long term. --Rob (talk) 09:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Just a routine WP:NOTNEWS violation at this point. If substantive consequences, actually comparable to the more genuinely notable 2013 Alberta floods, actually emerge over the coming days, then we can start a new article when that happens — but as long as all you can actually say about it is "a flood happened", the flood in question does not merit permanent coverage in an encyclopedia. Bearcat (talk) 22:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.