Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Quezon City fire (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Quezon City fire

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this wasn't a G4, the new article doesn't overcome the issues raised at the AfD. There was coverage around the fire, but no lasting coverage to indicate this was a significant event. Star Mississippi 21:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Philippines. Star Mississippi 21:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping prior participants: @Hariboneagle927, Jim Michael 2, Shellwood, HueMan1, CruzRamiss2002, Sleddog116, Dunutubble, Dubstar44, Lenticel, Howard the Duck, Nosebagbear, and SBKSPP:

Star Mississippi 21:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and in the event they're not watching, from the speedies on this version: @Justlettersandnumbers, Migfab008, Onel5969, and Mccapra: Star Mississippi 22:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still delete. Tens of fires in QC in 2022; this one last week killed less but affected more than this one. All but one refs deal with the fire as it happened; the other ref explains how fire spreads in slums so it's not really relevant to this exact fire as no two disasters are exactly alike so you can't generalize stuff. In other words, no sustained coverage. Residential fires are almost certainly unnotable; but fires in commercial and industrial areas may be, such as the Ozone Disco fire (also in QC) and Kentex slipper factory fire. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:LASTING, nothing historic about the fire and no follow up coverage has been made.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 23:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete still fails WP:LASTING. Like I said in the AfD before. This is regular occurrence. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:SIGCOV. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete still doesn't meet WP:LASTING per same reason from my previous AfD stand. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 12:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 01:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge. Same reasons as above, but if the fire is the most significant one to affect the Barangay UP Campus area, maybe it could be merged and summarized in the barangay article's history section.

Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 22:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt as WP:NOTNEWS. Still fails WP:LASTING per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.