Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2093 Genichesk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2093 Genichesk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to list of minor planets 2000-3000. Boleyn (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: At least three papers found on Google scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Along with a couple of lightcurve studies that I wouldn't think of as enough by themselves [1] [2] there are several papers on its unusual chemical composition as part of the Baptistina family and suggestions that it may be related to the K/T impactor [3] [4] [5]. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per comments above. Boleyn (talk) 07:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.