Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Game (proprietary card game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 Game (proprietary card game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game that doesn't cite any refs, can't find any sources except for maybe a mention here. IMO doesn't meet GNG and should be deleted. VickKiang (talk) 07:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination; insufficent evidence to establish notability. — The Anome (talk) 07:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The current sourcing is non-existent, and WP:GNG isn't demonstrated. Also "proprietary" in article name is just plain ugly and demotivates me from even trying to look for more sources. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No effective sources that can be used to establish notability. scope_creep^Talk 22:42, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to fail WP:GNG Kazanstyle (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.