Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

2MASX J22550681+0058396

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396
• Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

2MASX J22550681+0058396 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850 SkyFlubbler (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

  delete per nomination ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 02:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Delete per nomination. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 21:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Just to add, I think we need a more rigorous discussion of this object. The criteria is significant coverage, not mere mention. And no such study exists. SkyFlubbler (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

There is some commentary beyond the trivial mention in a table in three small scale studies: [1][2], and [3], and there is of course the hubble's picture of the week. Weak keep. --C messier (talk) 17:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as right now it's No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Delete - I removed all the text that was trying to summarize content from catalog papers. There's not really anything left. - Parejkoj (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.