Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Broke Girls: A XXX Parody
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2 Broke Girls: A XXX Parody (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This film fails to meet notability per WP:NF or any other measure. I did try to find additional coverage before nominating. The sources for the article are by no means reliable. One is a blog and the other two are even listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography#Generally unreliable sources. SVTCobra 22:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SVTCobra 22:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No reliably sourced evidence of notability. Claims of being more than run of the mill porn can't even be supported by unreliable sources. AVN Award nominations tend to be something for every studio. This film was one of nine nominees in a niche category, Best VR Sex Scene.[1] If they couldn't fill the 15 nominee quota, this looks like a participation trophy. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Going by the 'plot', there was participation by multiple parties here, to be sure. 🤭 That said... Nate • (chatter) 03:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Porn parody whose market was very limited when it was released (2BG was cancelled in 2017; this came out two years later, in 2019), and as a niche VR project in an experimental market. Nate • (chatter) 03:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment We'd need a heck of a lot more from the technical standpoint of the VR to actually get this to be notable. I mean, porn is porn. They literally make thousands of these a year. Oaktree b (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clickbait with at least two of the only three references being crowd sourced web sites that are not accepted as reliable by Wikipedia for any type of media-related articles. — Maile (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This is a run of the mill porn video that received no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.