Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/501 7th Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 20:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

501 7th Avenue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable building. Analogous to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/111 West 33rd Street DMacks (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article doesn't make any claim of special notability for this building, nor is any such notability indicated in the references provided. No interesting historical info is popping up for me on Google, just routine commercial info. It looks like a WP:Run-of-the-mill commercial building and doesn't meet WP:GEOFEAT.PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, tentatively.
- Note that comparing this article to an already-deleted one doesn't work; I and other AFD participants cannot see the deleted article.
- I think this must be a contributing building in the Garment Center Historic District, based on its location and description of the district at National Register of Historic Places listings in Manhattan from 14th to 59th Streets (so then it would be listed on the National Register of Historic Places) and it might be a NYC Landmark. Unfortunately the NYS historic preservation dept.'s interface to see NRHP documents is quite wonky; i haven't yet consulted the NRHP doc for the district to see what it does in fact say about this building. Others can try by following hints for NYS NRHP access at wp:NRHPHELP#New York. --do ncr am 03:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. Seems like a WP:MILL building. Regarding that it is within the Garment Center Historic District, that appears to be true but I believe the district includes several hundred structures. A "contributing property" would not be notable by itself without meeting GNG. MB 02:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This literally just states that the building exists and sources the fact to the self-published website of the real estate management company that owns it, neither stating nor sourcing anything that could be considered a notability claim at all. And it's not enough to just assert that it's probably a contributing building to the historical character of its neighbourhood — if you can't source any substantive content about the building, your assumptions about what must probably be true carry no ice. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.