Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-Jacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) SL93 (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A-Jacks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this concrete product. SL93 (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep first source in article is good, second source is not. So current state of article fails GNG. However, I also found [1], [2], [3], [4]. That seems sufficient for GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Consider this withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 02:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.