Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. W. (poet)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- A. W. (poet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pretty sure this fails WP:NPOET, a search revealed nothing. Noah 💬 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Noah 💬 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Noah 💬 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong Keep It wasn't hard to find the extended discussion here, & no doubt there is more. Obviously you have to be clever with the search terms for an anon figure; I doubt you were. Inadequate WP:BEFORE. Johnbod (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep in addition to Johnbod's source, [1] their "songs worthily found place in many anthologies and song-books of the age". Likely more exists offline, given that they fl. 1602. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per the above noted sourcing. -- Whpq (talk) 18:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - this journal article was published by University of North Carolina Press and discusses the subject and their work in depth. And other sources, particularly offline, are likely to exist as Eddie891 points out. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per the above discussion. --Gazal world (talk) 11:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.