Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACM ICPC Dhaka Site

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 00:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ACM ICPC Dhaka Site (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD; my concern was is that it has exclusively local weak third-party coverage, and that even that comes from only two newspapers. wumbolo ^^^ 20:00, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Could you link to the coverage you're talking about, and relate that to our policies and guidelines? Nearly every English-language news source in Bangladesh is national ("local" to Bangladesh, a country of 160 million people) or local to Dhaka, a metropolitan area of 19.5 million people ("local" only in the sense that The New York Times is local to New York, or The Times is local to London). --Worldbruce (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    One of the newspapers is the Dhaka Tribune (articles [1] [2]). The other is the Daily Star which I mistakenly thought was a Dhaka newspaper (articles [3] [4] [5]). Not local then, but I'd say that most of these articles are promotional, short or only give the competition a slight mention. wumbolo ^^^ 16:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.