Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AKtoolbox
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- AKtoolbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG/WP:PRODUCT. Unsourced oneline on a Matlab add-on. Kleuske (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. One-sentence article that barely eludes speedy deletion. Cannot be merged into Matlab article, because it is from a third party. Notability is certainly a problem. Overall, this looks like the case of SourceForge project advertising itself on Wikipedia. —Codename Lisa (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Matlab Non-notable toolbox with very limited sourcing.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence found to show this meets WP:GNG. gongshow talk 09:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.