Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARHAX.studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. no indication of significance slakr^\ talk / 02:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ARHAX.studio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; studio fails WP:CORP. Article has no references and I couldn't find any significant coverage in secondary sources. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete does not meet WP:CORP, lacks coverage in 3rd party sources RadioFan (talk) 02:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.