Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fox In Space

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Fox In Space

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. References are all links to youtube except for a brief article from A.V. Club (related to Gizmodo and Lifehacker, but I don't consider this particularly reliable) that wasn't significant in coverage. Before search returned fan sites, still nothing reliable. Definitely nothing that covered the game the way this article does (no way to verify what's said). Aurornisxui (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a game, it's an animated web series. Iffy★Chat -- 16:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Iffy Thanks. Aurornisxui (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A fairly unnotable bit of fan work. The article from the A.V. Club, which is the only valid reference currently in the article, appears to be the only reliable secondary source out there. Searching for more brings up nothing further except for mentions in blogs or user comments, neither of which can be used to establish notability. 169.232.162.112 (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although the series is very well animated, there isn't much secondary sources that exist. I searched it on Google, and it was only talked about around April 26, 2016. Unless the series grows, an article shouldn't exist. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 02:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.