Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Month of Sundays (2001 film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 22:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- A Month of Sundays (2001 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES; needs two or more reviews/significant, reliable sources in order to be eligible. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 15:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep "It stars Rod Steiger in his final film role". We've deleted much worse, and I'm in no mood to leave this a redlink when we do have the basics of a stub fulfilled. Nate • (chatter) 23:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Final role of a well known established actor passes WP:NFILM criteria "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career." in my opinion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per the above. I found this review in Variety too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as there are enough reviewJackattack1597 (talk) 21:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.