Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abderrahmane Lounici

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abderrahmane Lounici

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability MrBauer24 (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many people in the UK knew mr Abderrahmane, but very little information was shared about him. Sources used were from the British Broadcasting Corperation. As someone who lived in leyton for a long period of time, he was a well known individual. VICE news and Ladbible also confirmed that his name was indeed Abderrahmane Lounici. Mrm1235 (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the sources are provided from the BBC, more sources will be provided towards the future. Mrm1235 (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Need to include the sources in the article. The onus is on you (the article creator) to prove notability. HarrySONofBARRY (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i already included the sources in the article, if you actually went on the page you would see this is true. Furthermore, there is only about 2 newspaper articles about him. So your in the wrong. Mrm1235 (talk) 09:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That source does not cover most of the information included in the article. For example, the name "Richi" is not mentioned once in the article. Neither is "Mali Boys". Nor the Arabic translation. Drill is not mentioned at all. etc. Most of the articles information is therefore original research, which isn't permitted on Wikipedia. In addition, you haven't properly referenced the information you're using that source for. Further more, one source in and of itself does not prove notability, which is a requirement for Wikipedia articles. If there are only 2 articles on the internet about this person, then he most likely is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. I understand this is no doubt frustrating. I kindly recommend you check out some resources for new editors, WP:FIRST and WP:PRIMER. For what it's worth, I am familiar with the topic. HarrySONofBARRY (talk) 21:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability requires passage of WP:GNG, which requires a lot more than just one source. We're not looking just for verification that he exists, we're looking for evidence that the things he did have been externally validated as having enduring significance of the people will still be looking for information about it ten years from now variety, and nothing here has been shown to satisfy that standard. Bearcat (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.