Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Daim
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Abdul Daim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears to be notable for a single event. Saqib (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a WP:BLP1E. No evidence enduring coverage or indication that the subject meets any of the notability guidelines. – Joe (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete winning one pre-college competition does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete such awards themselves can never make person notable on Wikipedia. Every day around the world scholarship offers and academic awards are given to students and such events received press coverage but insufficient and not lasting enough to assert real notability. –Ammarpad (talk) 15:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty clear case of WP:BLP1E. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.