Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Agarwal Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The proposals to redirect to a redlink are discounted. Stifle (talk) 16:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Agarwal Arts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NORG, much of the sourcing in the article is about the films the production house has made, where it itself receives non-significant mentions. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Abhishek Agarwal per WP:ATD-R. Does not meet/warrant its own article per WP:NCORP. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per sources slightly have coverage and produced film. @@@XyX _talk 21:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep this studio recently co-produced The Kashmir Files with Zee Studio which not only became one of the biggest grossers of 2022.^[1] but is also currently a very hot topic with a sequel on its way, and they also have a few films lined up in Telugu too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradoxodarap (talk • contribs) 11:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC) @@@XyX _talk 11:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet NCORP or GNG. The keep !votes should be dismissed out of hand, the first one because its incoherent and the second because notability is not inherited and being "a very hot topic" is not a convincing argument unless sources can be presented to show this (and again, the argument is about one of the studio's films...). The film producer seems himself of at best dubious notability so doesn't look like an appropriate target anyways. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Revert to Draft~~ I will continue to develop the article and ask for review on a later date when I think it got enough ground for Notability per WP:NCORP. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to add more context to my previous comment ~~Re: Strong Keep~~, Abhishek Agarwal Arts as a studio Dhamaka, Tiger nageshwara Rao, Karthikeya 2, The Delhi Files and Goodachari 2, all of these movies are big budget films and will endorse/bring notability to the studio, I believe with right citations & references then I could re-submit the article again. Thank you. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Have added and will keep improving the article, Please drop me a notification/tag once the decision is made. Thank you :) bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paradoxodarap Unfortunately you missed out attribution to the content copied from other pages — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    
    I've stricken off the two duplicate !votes — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Hungama, Bollywood. "The Kashmir Files Box Office Collection | India | Day Wise | Box Office - Bollywood Hungama". Retrieved 2022-03-22.

Redirect to Abhishek Agarwal per WP:ATD-R — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Abhishek Agarwal per WP:ATD, the company fails WP:NCORP notability criteria HighKing⁺⁺ 19:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll note that that article was also nominated for deletion and redirecting there would be essentially bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  This is a good mess now. Should we hold closing this one until the main article AfD resolves? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  It doesn't really cause a problem, redirects to deleted pages are deleted as well (WP:G8). This kind of situation isn't too uncommon. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 10:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] Hungama, Bollywood. "The Kashmir Files Box Office Collection | India | Day Wise | Box Office - Bollywood Hungama". Retrieved 2022-03-22.

[1]