Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abishur Prakash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abishur Prakash

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the book seem to have received any critical reception. Most of the sources are his quotes and statements in WP:RS but they aren't significant or even basic coverages (or discussions) about him. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NAUTHOR. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There is this book review that was already in the article. I also found this review, this review, and this review. SL93 (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SL93 , thanks for bringing these to notice. I am uncertain if these could be considered WP:RS. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomadicghumakkad The first review is from Politique étrangère, the second review is from Mandiner, the third review is from the second largest political weekly newspaper in Hungary (the URL listed on the page redirects to the URL hang.hu), and the fourth review is from Hetek (magazine). SL93 (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will check these! Appreciate your patience, SL93 and efforts. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as there are enough book reviews for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.