Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abram Ilcisin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 22:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abram Ilcisin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a youth activist, not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for activists. As always, activists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically possible to verify that they exist -- the notability test requires evidence of significance, such as major awards and/or substantive media attention. But of the eight footnotes here, three are primary source press releases from organizations he's directly affiliated with, which are not support for notability; one just tangentially verifies the existence of a protest march while completely failing to mention Abram Ilcisin at all in conjunction with it; and the other four are just brief glancing namechecks of his existence within media coverage which isn't about him, which is not how you get a person over WP:GNG. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a much stronger notability claim, and much better sourcing for it, than just existing as a local organizer of activist marches. Bearcat (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment out of process, no notice. Blurjoey (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What process do you think the AFD process is "out of", exactly? Bearcat (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jackattack1597 (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All sourcing I could find, including what is already in the article, only mentions the subject in passing. I commend the subject for their excellent work around climate change, but, I believe it is WP:TOOSOON for this young activist to have their own Wikipedia article until he can meet our WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Missvains's statement. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.