Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerated Learning Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accelerated Learning Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an advertisement. Fails WP:CORP Coderzombie (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look for sources? Here is coverage in the National Law Review. Here is covereage in Daily Kos. A management company of numerous high schools would certainly seem to me to be defacto notable anyway if an individual high school is notable. And it seems they are expanding outside of Florida see here. Here is one of the reports on one of the school's they operate. Here is a report form the Charlotte Observer on the company's expansion there. Here is a public document about their activities in Lee COunty Florida. Here is an editorial that seems to deal with one of the company's executives. Here is coverage of some of their schools. And what exactly is advertorial? Doesn't the article just say that it is a charter school operator? WHat exactly do you object to? Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DailyKos article seems to talk about illegal activities of the organization, so as per Wikipedia:CORP#Illegal_conduct, doesn't qualify as a source. Knoxview article just has a line about the company and doesn't say anything about it in particular. Same for national law review article and charlotte observer. Thus, there is no Wikipedia:CORP#Depth_of_coverage. To be frank, I didn't find any of the sources in my first search, so I'm not quite sure about proceeding with the deletion, but will keep the discussion open for now. Coderzombie (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable charter school operator overseeing numerous schools. Covered substantially in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete No notability per WP:CORP--Zipezap (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ As a nominator, and aforementioned reasons. Coderzombie (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - struck duplicate !vote from the nominator directly above. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.