Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acme Tackle Company
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Little Cleo. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Acme Tackle Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable commercial company. Speedy deletion declined on the grounds that "The Little Cleo has been deemed by Field & Stream to be one of the 50 greatest lures of all time" is a claim of significance. Lyndaship (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Little Cleo. Not sure that's notable either. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Is this the same company as mentioned in this book? If so, the article doesn't appear correctly written or referenced. HighKing++ 16:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Little Cleo. Not independently notable and Wikipedia surely does not need two article on these closely related topics. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.