Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actin (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects may be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actin (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Creator was paid to write it. Boleyn (talk) 09:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Totally not notable. Written like an advert and uses a lot of buzz words anyway. Improving the article wouldn't be worth it. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Energid Technologies: While noting the 2017 notability discussion on the article Talk page, there is clearly enough to show that this software is in use, for example in products by Robai (another declared paid-edit), but I don't see enough to establish notability distinct from Energid Technologies, on which article (another declared paid-edit) this product is covered in sufficient detail. AllyD (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.