Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Daub
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established, no WP:SOURCES, problems with WP:V Rackabello 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete A7, unremarkable band/musician. - superβεεcat 19:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, un-sourced and non-notable. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 20:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The band he belongs to seems to barely squeak by WP:BAND, having appeared in a notable festival at least by Wiki standards...so far.--Sethacus 20:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Which part of WP:BAND is that? I think I missed it. And I'm not so sure about the notability of Eccentrik. That might be up for debate. -- Ben 20:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think Sethacus is saying that the festival appearance would make a speedy delete inappropriate. J Milburn 21:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. Cool. Thanks. -- Ben 21:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup. That's what I was getting at, in my own roundabout way. I will say delete, though. Despite his band, Clockwerk, having done "numberous" performances, according to its wiki article, there's no evidence of that in reliable sources. I'm going to bring the band to Afd to see what say the community.--Sethacus 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. Cool. Thanks. -- Ben 21:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He's that guy from Clockwerk, but notability is not inherited. Bearian 15:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.