Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adetola Nola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adetola Nola

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "30 under 30" BLP article with the usual mix of dependent sources, sources about various businesses and not the subject, routine announcements, inclusion in lists, and non-notable awards. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO. FalconK (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. FalconK (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — Advertisement, yes. Notable? Yes. Could be deleted and recreated in an encyclopaedic tone. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 17:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep more than enough sourcing from the Vanguard News, which I think is a reliable source from previous AfD discussions, that's about all I find though. Oaktree b (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- May I suggest revisiting this? The two Vanguard News citations are both interviews. FalconK (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to discuss the adequacy of sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past WP:OUTCOMES. I read the consensus of the community as deleting articles about "30 under 30" living people, absent significant coverage outside the list. If I am wrong, please provide links. Bearian (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per reasoning by Bearian. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.