Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditi Technologies
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 02:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aditi Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is intended for promotion with no valid reliable sources. Benedictdilton (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ADVERT. I mean, this article about a company called Aditi Technologies had much of its content added by a user called...Aditi Technologies. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I can see multiple mentions in leading newspapers like
- Reuters India
- Business-Standard
- DNA India
- SiliconIndia
- Economic Times
- TheHinduBusinessLine
- Indian Express
- MyDigitalFC
- DeccanHerald
- Samachar
- Telegraph India
- and more...
If the article is written like advert, it requires clean-up, not deletion! --Tito Dutta (contact) 07:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note: source 3, DNA India, is a press release - "Agency: PR Newswire". That's not a valid source as it is essentially self-published. I haven't looked in detail at the other sources, but it would be worth checking to see if they are churnalistic rewrites of the press release. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Titodutta has provided the references to meet GNG. Advert alone is not a valid reason for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Titodutta has provided good number of references.-- Chinmayisk 11:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinmayisk (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.