Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Services Executive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus to delete, DGG ( talk ) 19:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aero Services Executive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company fails WP:CORP. I cannot find any significant, reliable coverage from sources not affiliated with the company. All there can be found are the most basic pieces of information (adress, phone number...), and the mere existence of this company surely doesn't make it notable. --FoxyOrange (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 06:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vacation9 00:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- They've been in trouble and definitely exist, but don't have significant secondary coverage. Therefore, delete as an unremarkable charter airline. —Theopolisme (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.